The pianist played one of the last mazurkas of Chopin. There were elegance, captivating ease. Under the fingers of the musician appeared charming miniature, which wanted to enjoy without end. A few days later the same Mazurka performed by another pianist. Sounded the same notes, but what is it?.. Perceived it quite lo another. In it, you could hear the sadness, pensiveness, unclear expectations...
Not going to find out who the musicians are more correctly understood the Mazurka. The main thing is, the content of every piece of music is so vast and multifaceted, it offers so many different opportunities that every player plays differently. It can emphasize the grace or daydreaming, play tighter or looser to allocate the execution of the main melody or to encircle her tiny motifs echoing accompaniment... May your dotting semantic accents, something to allocate dynamically, somewhere a little bit to speed up or slow down the tempo, and the music will sound very different.
The interpretation of a musical work by the contractor and is called interpretation (Latin interpretatio - explanation, interpretation, interpretation.
But it is impossible to think that the performer plays, regardless of the intent of the composer, with instructions made in the notes. The purpose of the interpretation must be faithful to the interpretation of the works. As a pianist, conductor, violinist, singer strives to impart the feelings and thoughts that have invested in their music.